This Week’s Featured Watch #51 – the Diamond Flake

In 1962 Citizen introduced the beautifully named Diamond Flake based on the 0700 movement. Why this name? well a diamond flake would be thin, and at the time the 0700 movement was the thinnest Japanese design, measuring just 2.75mm deep – beating the Seiko Gold Feather by 0.2mm. I say ‘beating’ because there was something of a race to produce the thinnest movements, following the fashion for ever slimmer dress watches.

Here’s an ad from the time:

The movement was made with either 25 or 31 jewels, and later a date version was made (2700 movement, 25 jewels). My example has the 25 jewels calibre:

The logo at the 12 0’clock position is unique to the Diamond Flake, and the narrow hands on this model emphasise the slender overall design:

The thin movement allows a slim case:

This is a hand winder of course, an automatic would have been necessarily thicker to accommodate the rotor and auto winding system. The gold finish of the movement indicates that this was a good quality model:

The case back, with production in September 1963:

Some models were depth rated to 40 meters, but these were essentially dress watches, wearing light and comfortable under the cuff.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Vintage Watches and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to This Week’s Featured Watch #51 – the Diamond Flake

  1. stuartm1970 says:

    Reblogged this on Vintage Watches Middle East.

  2. Scott says:

    Stumbled across this through Google, nice watch! What’s the case diameter on yours?

  3. Scott says:

    Sounds like a good size. Any interest in selling it or know where I can locate an identical one?

    • sweephand says:

      Hi Scott, not for sale I’m afraid. These aren’t easy to find 😦 They occasionally crop up on eBay, although sometimes in poor condition – that’s how I got my parts watch.

      Stephen

  4. scott says:

    If you ever change your mind… 🙂

  5. Daniele says:

    Hi , I have just bought a watch like this. The mine like your have on the back the write STAR , do you know why ? Tks

    • sweephand says:

      Hi Daniele, thanks for visiting my blog. Citizen made their watch cases at the ‘STAR’ factory – I believe STAR was a company in its own right before Citizen acquired it, and the name continued to be used into the early 1960s. Stephen

      • Daniele says:

        Tks! now is more clear..
        Now I have to wait my watch form Japan and than send it for a service to my watchsmith.
        I think that is hard to find part for this movement ..is a solid movement or fragile in your opinion?

        • sweephand says:

          Although it’s a very thin movement, it is well made and solid, so providing it is in decent condition it should run well for a long time once it’s been serviced. It won’t be water resistant of course, but with reasonable care it should be fine. Stephen

          • Daniele says:

            Tks Stephen , I cross my finger and I hope
            my watchsmith have the skill for service this thin movement ..

            • sweephand says:

              You’re welcome, and I hope all goes well with the watch. Stephen

              • daniele says:

                Hi, i have another question perhaps you can help me. My dial have some stain in the edge that i can’t accept 😦 and I’m looking for another better dial . Maybe do you have a spare parts Dial in nice condition ? or your friends citizen community ? any suggestions are appreciate , tsk !

                • sweephand says:

                  Hi Daniele, I’m afraid replacement dials are very hard to find for any vintage Citizen watches and I don’t know of anything available. The best place to look for parts is Yahoo Japan, where there are more spare parts advertised, but it could be a long and difficult search. Stephen

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s